Veverka v konopi

Education is not a crime!

Legalizace magazine and its editor-in-chief, Robert Veverka have been formally accused of “inciting and promoting toxicomania”, with penalties of up to five years of imprisonment. The first court hearing will take place on Tuesday, October 5 at 8:30 AM at the district court in the town of Bruntál, Czech Republic.

The goal of Legalizace magazine, a bimonthly periodical dedicated not only to cannabis, is to provide unbiased information about drug issues with regard to human rights and environmental protection. Since its founding in 2010, the magazine has published interviews with notable individuals, articles on drug legislation, cultivation technologies and methods, information about cannabis treatment, studies and scientific findings, news coverage from both the Czech Republic and abroad, and articles concerning history and culture.

According to Czech law, cannabis is considered a regular agricultural crop plant and also possesses the status of a medicinal plant, and its cultivation and processing is permitted in compliance with Act No. 167/1998 Czech Law Coll. without special permission. Given this fact, Legalizace magazine considers the criminal charges of “inciting and promoting toxicomania” not only an instance of systematic failure and demonstrable ignorance of cannabis legislation by the prosecuting authorities but also a gross infringement of freedom of expression and the right to information guaranteed by the Czech Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms.

The prosecution, which is calculated, stigmatizing, borderline untruthful, and based on fallacious conjectures and limited interpretation by the police that the cultivation and processing of cannabis is automatically illegal or that any mention of cannabis automatically equates ‘inciting toxicomania’, comprises a dangerous precedent comparable to totalitarian repression and censorship. I consider it my duty to fight not only for the right of Legalizace magazine to exist, but also for the rights of all print and electronic media who have ever dared mention the word ‘cannabis’ – or plan to do so in the future,” said Robert Veverka, the editor-in-chief, regarding the indictment.

From its inception, the purpose of Legalizace magazine has always been to provide comprehensive, objective, and balanced information about the cannabis plant regarding its botanical, industrial, medicinal, and legal contexts. The aim has also been to point out the dismal state of drug policies, whose efforts do not fulfill the declared intention of a world without drugs. On the contrary, the current prohibition increases the risks of addiction and is primarily aimed at the repression of high-risk groups. Legalizace magazine has never incited its readers to abuse psychoactive substances of any kind – on the contrary, it has substituted the role of the state in situations where, for instance, legal cannabis patients are not provided enough information about how to handle prescribed cannabis or what kinds of risks or side effects can arise in connection to said cannabis use. According to expert opinions, Legalizace magazine is one of the most significant components of the tertiary prevention system in the Czech Republic in terms of protecting society from psychoactive substances and the negative effects of their abuse.

Legalizace magazine and its editor-in-chief invite all the public and media who care about the freedom of expression and the future of cannabis to attend the trial, which will take place on October 5, 2021 at 8:30 AM at the district court in the town of Bruntál, room 210A.

Contact for the media:
Robert Veverka, tel. +420 773 691 561, email: robert@legalpub.cz
Web: https://magazin-legalizace.cz/

FB: https://www.facebook.com/magazinlegalizace
FB Event: https://www.facebook.com/events/396682462064878

Robert Veverka is the publisher and editor-in-chief of Legalizace magazine, the head of the Legalizace.cz NGO, a member of the Prague Council Commission for Drug Policy Coordination, and a representative and member of the Security Commission and Education Commission of the Prague 2 municipal borough.

Erec Hand & Topbud 2018-111

Recommendations for regulating the recreational use of cannabis in the European Union

TEMPLATE LETTER TO THE MEPs

 

Situational analysis

 

Every week, 90.2 million European citizens risk being sold a synthetic cannabis product
or cannabis contaminated with pesticide and other harmful substances.
Every day, criminal organisations continue to strengthen their market monopoly.
Every hour, 1% of European citizens risks being arrested by the police.


Rationale

The European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights underlines the importance of keeping the individual at the helm of every decision making and ensures that the universal principles of human dignity, freedom, equality, solidarity, democracy, security, sustainability, and rule of law are upheld for every European citizen. The four freedoms of the EU; free movement of people, goods and capital, and freedom of establishment, complement and strengthen the fundamental rights of the individual. Furthermore, adherence and full participation to the unifying and noble targets of sustainable development set by the UN Sustainable Developments Goals 2030, further enhance the critical nexus between justice, security, and well-being.

The EU Agenda and Action plan on drugs 2021-2025 [2] emphasises that:

The aim of the EU Agenda on Drugs is to protect citizens through better coordinated measures that will: (i) have a substantive and measurable impact on the security and health issues arising from drug use and the operations of the drug market; and, (ii) address both the direct and indirect consequences arising from this problem including links to violence and other forms of serious crime, related health, and societal problems, environmental damage, while raising public and policy awareness on these issues.

Furthermore, prevention and awareness, including addressing stigma are identified as key to prevent substance use and harms associated with it. The priorities also propose the introduction of wider harm reduction measures and alternatives to coercive methods.

When looking at the prevalence of cannabis consumption in the European Union standing at 27.2% and cannabis law offences amounting to 75% of all European union drug law offences (majority of reported seizures involve small quantities confiscated from personal consumers), the draconian European approach is evidently causing more harm than good. The current policy frameworks adopted by national governments, predominantly criminalising and persecuting personal consumers and cultivators, continues to propagate an environment of discrimination and injustice.

Some European Union Member States have since the early 1990s recognised that the criminalisation of the personal cultivation, consumption and sharing of cannabis is not conducive to better public health and social well-being outcomes for the community. These initiatives, together with other policy changes in the years that followed, introduced various legislative measures to address the widespread consumption of cannabis and primarily separate the personal consumer and cultivator from the criminal justice system. The shift towards a decriminalised system aims to directly disrupt the monopoly of the illicit drugs market, whilst ensuring law enforcement agents direct their attention and resources towards more pressing and violent crimes such as domestic violence, human trafficking, money laundering, and homicide.

Furthermore, it may be advisable to view regulation as a process in which revisions and corrections are not seen as failures, but pave the way for efficient regulation that promotes health policy goals. To make this possible, the necessary flexibility in implementation should be planned for from the beginning. After all, an innovation such as the regulation of the cannabis market primarily involves a social, but also legislative learning process, which is accompanied by progress and setbacks. In order to be able to continuously take into account new experiences in regulation, coordination and evaluation are cornerstones of any regulation.


Recommendations for the Members of the European Parliament and the EU Member States

Considering the core European values of defending and upholding human dignity, freedom, and equality for all European citizens, included in the European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights [3], particularly Article 7; respect for private and family life, Article 8; protection of personal data, Article 12; freedom of Assembly of Association, and Article 21; Non-discrimination;

Noting the UN International Guidelines on Human Rights and Drug Policy [4] placing human dignity and sustainable development at the centre of Member State responses to illicit drug economies;

Noting the aims and priorities of the EU Agenda on Drugs (2021-2025) particularly enhanced security measures to disrupt criminal organizations, the use of alternatives to coercive methods, and broader inclusion of harm reduction tools to educate citizens and mitigate harm originating from substance use;

Recognising the potential risks associated with driving and operating heavy machinery under the influence of psychoactive substances and the need to ensure road-side testing reflects clinically determined impairment levels [5];

Considering the high prevalence of cannabis consumption in the EU standing at 27.2% of life-time consumers and 1% of daily consumers;

Considering the large proportion of cannabis law offences amount to 75% of all drug related offences and the shocking reality that the majority of reported seizures involve small quantities confiscated for personal consumption;

Considering the current inconsistency between member state’s approach to a non-violent personal choice to consume, cultivate and share cannabis, and the various legislative changes and ongoing discussions at national level to decriminalise the personal consumption and cultivation of cannabis;

  1. Calls on the European Parliament to recognise the unjust and dangerous reality of criminalising a personal and private matter of consuming, cultivating, and sharing cannabis, including its derivatives and products;
  2. Calls on the European Parliament to honour the rights and freedoms enshrined in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights for people who consume cannabis and promote an inclusive and regulatory framework built on human dignity, respect for private life, and social justice;
  3. Urges the European Parliament to take a strong stance in favour of human rights, public health, and harm reduction for all people, including people who use cannabis, and promote effective approaches to disrupt the criminal drugs market;
  4. Invites the European Parliament to recognise the health and social benefits of allowing self-cultivation and encourages the Member States to discuss the amount of plants allowed to grow per person for personal use;
  5. Invites the European Parliament to recognise the health and social benefits of Cannabis Social Clubs (CSC) and encourages the Member States to facilitate the creation of CSC [6];
  6. Urges the European Parliament to encourage the Member States to introduce the expungement of criminal records for non-violent and non-harming cannabis convictions and ensure any administrative sanctions adopted in the case of a breach of rights are proportionate and do not impinge on the fundamental rights of European Union citizens;
  7. Encourages a more active and inclusive approach with civil society organisations directly working with people who consume cannabis, including cannabis growers’ cooperatives and experts in the field of cannabis, and promote a European-wide campaign on safe, organic, and sustainable personal cultivation practices.

______________

[1] EMCDDA. (2020). European Drug Report 2020: Trends and Developments. Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg.

[2] European Commission. (2020). EU Agenda And Action Plan On Drugs 2021-2025. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Brussels, 24.7.2020, Com(2020), 606 Final.

[3] European Convention. (2012). Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (CFR). Official Journal of the European Union, 26.10.2012, C 326/391.

[4] United Nations. (2019). International Guidelines on Human Rights and Drug Policy.

[5]    Source: Dr. Fabian Pitter Steinmetz

[6] ENCOD. (2020). The Cannabis Social Club Guidelines.

 

Screenshot at 2021-04-16 18-13-16

Rolling into the future: Recreational cannabis legislation in the EU

Dear friends and members,

On Monday 19th of April at 10.30 (CET) we are inviting you to watch the conference organised by MEP Cyrus Engerer and ENCOD about the future of recreational use of cannabis in the European Union.

At the conference, we will look into the different kinds of policies currently in place across Europe and focus on policy options that respect the rights of people who consume cannabis, whilst pursuing and promoting health and harm reduction strategies. Regulation should be viewed as a continuous process whereby revisions and corrections are not interpreted as failures, but rather as interesting crossroads and paths that pave the way towards a human- and health-centred policy.

See the complete video of Dr. Mireia Ventura about harm reduction and the contamination of cannabis with synthetic cannabinoids.

 

Program

Introductory Remarks by MEP Cyrus Engerer (Malta)

Video messages from the Member States: Portugal (prof. dr. Ximene Rego, University of Minho and prof. dr. Olga Souza Cruz, University Institute of Maia), Malta (Andrew Bonello, Releaf), The Netherlands (Derrick Bergman, VOC), Spain (Oscar Parés, ICEERS), and Belgium (Michel Degens, Mambo Social Club)

Panel 1) Human Rights and Drug Policy

TITLE: The sustainability of current cannabis policies and practices (Moderator: Mr. Jonathan Cilia)

Video message: The (illegal) cannabis market in Italy and the economic implications of its legalization: prof. dr. Marco Rossi, University of Rome

Panel discussion:

Tom Blickman, Transnational Institute (NL)

Péter Sárosi, Rights Reporter Foundation (HUN)

Prof. Dr. Justus Haucap, economist (GER)

Dr. Constanza Sánchez, International Center for Ethnobotanical Education, Research and Service (ESP)

MEP Alviina Alametsä (FIN)

Panel 2) Rolling into the Future

TITLE: Essential policy principles for the recreational cannabis law (Moderator: Mr. Jonathan Cilia)

Introduction: MEP Mikuláš Peksa (Czech Republic)

Cannabis Social Clubs: prof. Dr. Mafalda Pardal (Ghent university)

Quality assurance, staff education, and harm reduction: Dr. Mireia Ventura (Energy Control)

Freedom to Farm: Dr. Maja Kohek and Gabriele Kozar (ENCOD)

Cannabis and driving – European Union guidelines on standardized field sobriety tests: Dr. Fabian Pitter Steinmetz (toxicologist)

Final remarks by MEP Cyrus Engerer (Malta)

Join us on the 19th of April 2021 at 10.30 (CET)!

 

IMG_20200303_155518-8

Side-events at the 64th Session of the Commission on Narcotic Drugs (CND)

Dear friends and members,

Once again the time has come.

At the 64th session of CND, ENCOD is organizing a side-event on the Heroin and Ibogaine Assisted Treatments, and co-organizing one about Strengthening the Prevention & Treatment of Cannabis Problematic Use.

You can join the virtual event about the Heroin and Ibogaine Assisted Treatments on the 13th of April 2021 from 9.00 to 9.50 (CET).

Heroin and Ibogaine Assisted Treatments CND 2021 ENCOD flyer

Check out the report from Ukraine here.

 

You can join the virtual event about Strengthening the Prevention & Treatment of Cannabis Problematic Use on the 15th of April 2021 from 14.10 to 15.00 (CET).

Strengthening the Prevention & Treatment of Cannabis Problematic Use CND 2021 DIANOVA flyer

 

Erec Hand & Topbud 2018

Coming up…

Dear friends and members,

In the past two months, our team was busy organizing a conference on the recreational use of cannabis in collaboration with the Maltese MEP Cyrus Engerer and his team.

Check out the teaser for the conference below, and we hope you tune in on the 19th of April at 10.30 (CET) to watch the conference online.

More information coming soon…

 

Suomen kannabisyhdistys: Finnish Cannabis Association

SKY, The Finnish Cannabis Association, has been founded in 1991 in order to influence drug policy in a way that cannabis cultivation and possession are permitted for adults and production and distribution become regulated.
As a veteran organization, it has a long experience with public appearances like the Wind Direction Action in 2020, an installation that showcased flags of countries that have already taken at least the first steps to a more reasonable drug policy.
Like many groups of civil society SKY suffered from a serious lack of funding, people stopped being interested when legalization did not happen instantly. But with a recent action SKY managed to regain attention, bringing an increase in membership, especially young people who have joined to strengthen their ranks.
SKY has initiated a successful citizens initiative to decriminalize cannabis use, for which they gathered 60.000 signatures. The initiative would stop punishing for using cannabis, allow a person to possess 25 grams, and grow 3 plants.
It was presented to Finland’s parliament on November 5th 2020, it is receiving a lot of media coverage and has reinvigorated the discussion within society. There will be a law committee hearing about the initiative on February 17th 2021. For updates and developments on the citizen’s initiative click here.
SKY is a long-standing member of ENCOD.

Sky.org

 

 

ibo1

In dubio pro reo: Free Sara Glatt!

ENCOD defends the freedom of persons to take an informed decision concerning the use of psychoactive substances and also supports ibogaine treatments but we emphasize that they have to be done in a secure context. We support the self-determination and empowerment of the people using all substances.

Therefore, we condemn the prosecution of Sara Glatt, who since many years practices ibogaine treatment to help the persons who want to stop using substances like heroin, methadone, cocaine, alcohol and amphetamines.

In the scientific literature, the withdrawal symptoms appear to be almost not existent after an ibogaine flood-dose although a complete medical check-up is needed since the treatment can be potentially fatal for persons with cardiovascular diseases or due to drug interactions during the session.

The treatment is not a magic silver bullet but allows the individuals to recover easier with proper after-care and sufficient personal motivation. The possible dangers are accounting for approximately 1 casualty every 300 patients. Being in the grey area does not mean to be responsible for the post-treatment patients or of treatments that were not activated.

500 years after the last witch trials in the Netherlands, the Dutch media call Sara the witch of Kockengen, the small village where she lived before she was arrested. We call out for a fairer trial under the motto “In dubio pro strigae” [In doubt for the witches].

According to the renown Dutch scientist Peter Cohen, the injustice of Sara Glatts’ conviction to 8 years in prison is based on the interpretation of the death of a person from Sweden, inside Sara’s house. This person came voluntarily but was refused both Iboga and an Iboga treatment by Sara because of her bad physical condition and because she came all alone (against Sara’s rules). The death of this person was nevertheless attributed to Iboga that the person somehow acquired inside the house where besides Sara also other people lived. In short, attributing this death to Sara’s responsibility is based on 2 weak interpretations:

1) it is scientifically impossible to make Iboga the CERTAIN cause of this death against the background of the person’s weak physical condition

2) it remained unknown who supplied the Iboga that entered the system of the Swedish person.

The attribution of this death to Sara Glatt’s responsibility is a consequence of the dominant (negative) perspective and narratives around drugs in general and Iboga specifically. I see this as resulting in a witch hunt, of which Sara is now a victim. Her conviction is a sloppy result of this process and does not satisfy a test of objectivity or even fairness. Without the weak interpretations, and with a bit more respect for all the unknowns and uncertainties around this death, Sara would have been free now. ENCOD requests that the doubts and uncertainties in this case will not be massively interpreted in Sara Glatt’s disadvantage. Where such serious doubts and uncertainties exist, objectivity and fairness should prevail.

Free Sara Glatt!

 

For a better drug policy1

The European Guidelines for Cannabis Social Clubs

Dear friends and members,

as part of the Freedom to Farm campaign, we are proud to publish the operation guide for Cannabis Social Clubs. 

Cannabis Social Clubs (CSC) are one of the most deeply-rooted and widespread models for regulating cannabis in the European Union. According to a study published a few months ago by the researchers of the University of Ghent, there are CSCs in 13 European countries. Although with some operational differences, this model guarantees a viable and effective regulatory option. CSCs also spread to various non-European countries. Currently, this type of organisation can be found in Argentina, New Zealand and they have been regulated in Uruguay since 2013.

CSCs are non-profit associations and base their activity on the self-supply of cannabis. The CSCs were born in Spain thanks to a long history of legal victories related to self-cultivation and shared consumption. At present, they are a real alternative to illicit markets, in which users themselves organize self-supply, thus guaranteeing the traceability and availability of the substance while reducing both legal and health risks. One of the main objectives of a CSC is the promotion of health and the reduction of potential risks or damages associated with consumption, as well as avoiding contact of users with illicit markets including preventing access for minors.

ENCOD is publishing the Guidelines to introduce good practices for Cannabis Social Clubs and to standardize the management model. Their purpose is to support civil society and offer a regulatory framework that ensures safe and controlled access to cannabis, as well as guarantee legal security for people who use cannabis.

You can also download the guidelines here.

Contact us for any further questions.

We wish you happy holidays and stay healthy!

 

IMG_4433-1

Canna-chaos in Vienna?

The genesis of the decision of today’s 63rd Reconvened Conference on Narcotic Drugs of the UN is certainly due to the perseverance of the international activists of ENCOD, FAAAT and the US Veterans for Safe Access and many other friends who from Mexico to Barcelona raised the cannabis issue and the legitimacy of the past control system which has been highly exaggerated as to cannabis issues.

For the first time, some poor and underprivileged activists of the civil society forced the WHO in Geneva after 5 years of intense work to make up their minds on the therapeutical potentials of the plant. It has been a long trip to stimulate and finally, the experts sent their recommendations to the drug authorities of the UN in Vienna. This long trip is not over yet. But considering it by some aspect quite unrealistic in some corridor discussions at the ENCOD GA in Slovenia, the actual result of 2nd of December 2020 is a real breaking point and a light in the darkness of the past century of cannabis prohibition.

As a matter of fact, the cannabis issue has been buried by a century of ignorance and bigotry starting with the fascist-racist imprinting of the Italian medical delegation at the 1925 meeting of the League of Nations that started to pose the cannabis issue as a threat to the white race throughout all the years where the science achieved seminal results in the cannabis research which were never taken to knowledge hitherto by the state community.

All efforts to reconsider cannabis as to the outdated 1961-1971 Single Convention on narcotic and psychotropic substances were postponed several times and discussed finally today at the 63rd Conference on Narcotic Drugs of the United Nations closing on the 6th of March 2020 and reconvened on 2-4th of December to establish the viability of cannabis in the global pharmacopoeia after the UN treaties in 1961 assessed its forfeiture in the medical applications despite the fact that most cannabis-related scientific the research was still to be done.

Two statements of civil society were sent to the CND, one lead by Encod (Vote Yes) with 195 signatures representing 53 nations stressing the need of the full recognition of the therapeutical potential of the cannabis plant and last but not least, the appeal, subscribed by Forum Droghe of Italy and others like Science for Democracy, that highlighted the importance of science-driven policies on this respect.

As a result, cannabis was taken out of schedule IV with the consent of 27 nations voting yes and 24 against. It is a historical change in the rather elephantine structure of the global drug control mechanism. Cannabis is still considered (mainly for political reasons, as admitted the WHO experts) as dangerous as heroin and fentanyl being left in schedule I. But the result will accelerate society to evaluate the empowerment of just and effective drug policies. The other proposals were rejected like the insert Dronabinol, the non-proprietary name of THC, from schedule II to schedule I. Also, the question of CBD was rejected and similar dispositions on extracts based on THC. There have been countries that rejected those recommendations being rather liberal on cannabis like Canada. Hungary seems out of control and meanwhile so obsessed that they opted against a major restriction of cannabis in schedule I as to pure THC remaining in Schedule II whereas the flowering tops remain notably in Schedule I.

Most probably the latitude of the single nations will grow and accomplishing the declarations of the former Bush and Obama drug czar John Brownfield whose doctrine allows the US to do whatever they might dispose of as to cannabis but tend to oblige the other nations to follow the flawed daily grind of the UN we have just attended today.
In the meanwhile and at the centre of our political agenda a simple and basic slogan:

Freedom to Farm!

 

PLEASE CHECK OUT THE CND MONITOR HERE:

Monitoring the vote on WHO medical cannabis recommendations (V6)